UX Digest - mejores posts

When UX Research Becomes a Decision System (and why it matters even more in an AI World) Criteo's UXR moved from reactive support to a Product Intelligence system that helps decide what to build and why. They built a shared repository, added intelligence, and repositioned around two moments: before building (strategic research) and after shipping (continuous CX KPIs). The sequence matters: invest in structure and clean data first, then deploy AI agents. Without structured data, AI creates noise; with strong signals, AI amplifies your system. 100% of stakeholders now report strategic impact NNG: Why User Panels Fail User panels can deteriorate in predictable ways, introducing bias and reducing their effectiveness for ongoing research AI: I Tried Using AI in UX Research — Here’s the Truth No One Talks About AI helped generate questions, surveys, pattern identification, and wireframes—making execution faster. But the real value came from users themselves. AI highlighted problems, but truly understanding user emotions required slowing down and reading between the lines. The common mistake: thinking AI can replace UX research. It can't feel frustration or emotional context. "AI brings speed. Humans bring understanding." Not replaced—amplified Experience: How UX Thinking Helped Me Solve Chronic Disease (And Why AI Can’t) A UX researcher cured her 29-year illness by finding a genetic mechanism driving chronic inflammation (Long COVID, MS, Parkinson's, obesity, depression are one mechanism, not separate diseases). A cheap generic drug addresses the root cause. AI can't do this — it only sees what it's programmed to see. Solving complex problems requires applied curiosity, not pattern recognition. The Star Trek pill exists. We just have to be willing to see it Case Study: EcoDispose - Hassle free e-waste disposal at your fingertips Users hoard e-waste due to three barriers: no easy pickup, no awareness, no data trust. Research revealed the "Hoarding Paradox" — motivated users do nothing because every option feels exhausting. The solution: three interface modes (Simple, Eco, Tech) and a data-wipe flow that turns fear into control. Trust, not convenience, was the real design brief Opinion: Your UX research didn’t fail. Your expectations did When someone says "we already knew that" in a research readout, that's not a research failure—it's an expectation failure. The real question research answers isn't "what surprised us?" but "what do we now know well enough to act on?" Findings that feel "obvious" are good: they resolve ambiguity and create shared reality. Stop measuring research by how surprising it is. Measure it by how confidently the team moves after. Next time someone says "we already knew that," ask: "So why hadn't we acted on it yet?" Basics: Why Familiar UX Wins - The Hidden Power Behind Jakob’s Law Jakob's Law: users prefer your site to work like other sites they already know. They don't want to learn your interface—they want to recognize it. Familiarity feels effortless because our brains rely on recognition (fast) over recall (slow). Break this law only when the new pattern is genuinely better and anchored in familiarity. Users don't reward difference—they reward ease. The best interfaces don't feel new; they feel obvious @uxdigest